• Map credible threats across the pipeline system (time‑dependent, stable, and time‑independent threats) so you see the full integrity picture.
• Segment the pipeline logically (by material, environment, operating conditions, and history) so risk decisions stay specific and practical.
• Integrate inspection and operating data (design, operations, incidents, and inspection results) because data integration strengthens threat clarity and prioritization.

2. Risk assessment – where to focus first

• Evaluate likelihood and consequence to rank segments and focus resources on the highest‑risk items first.
• Use risk‑based inspection logic so low‑risk segments do not consume unnecessary inspection effort while safety remains protected.
• Align with integrity management expectations where applicable, including program elements required for pipelines that could affect high‑consequence areas.

3. Mitigation planning – how to reduce risk

• Select risk‑appropriate mitigation actions such as targeted inspection, monitoring improvements, repairs, or operational controls.
• Apply root cause analysis to address underlying contributors and prevent recurrence of integrity issues